You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current draft for ITE-10 supports multiple predicate types per step, but it's possible this introduces more complexity than is needed. The original idea was to support witness's attestation collections-like workflows, but we may be better off specially handling those types or finding some other mechanism for such steps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IMO, this scenario seems more suitable for something like sub-policies. Although we could do something specific for the collections and handle them differently.
The current draft for ITE-10 supports multiple predicate types per step, but it's possible this introduces more complexity than is needed. The original idea was to support witness's attestation collections-like workflows, but we may be better off specially handling those types or finding some other mechanism for such steps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: