We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should we add a CompositeTransform?
CompositeTransform
e.g. if we want a MeanStdScaling after a LogTransform we could write MeanStdScaling ∘ LogTransform.
MeanStdScaling
LogTransform
MeanStdScaling ∘ LogTransform
I don't think the API can support this in its present form, since it does not distinguish between constructing the transforms and fitting them.
Related to #99. cc @AlexRobson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Composite
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Should we add a
CompositeTransform
?e.g. if we want a
MeanStdScaling
after aLogTransform
we could writeMeanStdScaling ∘ LogTransform
.I don't think the API can support this in its present form, since it does not distinguish between constructing the transforms and fitting them.
Related to #99. cc @AlexRobson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: