You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Is it possible to configure a remote ipfs node in the desktop application? I'm running IPFS on my NAS, and exposing all the correct ports from there.
Running the local desktop client, and adjusting the ipfs config to point at it doesn't seem to cover this. Adding files to IPFS locally puts them into ~/.ipfs and doesn't seem to leverage my NAS?
Describe the solution you'd like
Ability for the desktop app to function in a "headless" mode controlling a remote ipfs gatway.
Config
Here's the config i tried. 192.168.1.10 is my remote ipfs node. The ports are correct for each service
No. IPFS Desktop is designed to control the local ipfs daemon that it installs.
You may be able to get the remote control behaviour you want by using the webui... if you update your ipfs config on your 192.168.1.10 node with the changes you show above, and include a CORS allow-origin header for the api like
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Is it possible to configure a remote ipfs node in the desktop application? I'm running IPFS on my NAS, and exposing all the correct ports from there.
Running the local desktop client, and adjusting the ipfs config to point at it doesn't seem to cover this. Adding files to IPFS locally puts them into ~/.ipfs and doesn't seem to leverage my NAS?
Describe the solution you'd like
Ability for the desktop app to function in a "headless" mode controlling a remote ipfs gatway.
Config
Here's the config i tried. 192.168.1.10 is my remote ipfs node. The ports are correct for each service
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: