Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relased version 0.3.5_linux_amd64 shows 0.3.4 version #1810

Closed
ChristianKniep opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

relased version 0.3.5_linux_amd64 shows 0.3.4 version #1810

ChristianKniep opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 8 comments
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)

Comments

@ChristianKniep
Copy link
Contributor

While downloading the 0.3.5 version, it shows something else as version string.
Wrong file uploaded?

[root@f1d0aa3022dc tmp]# unzip ipfs_v0.3.5_linux-amd64.zip
Archive:  ipfs_v0.3.5_linux-amd64.zip
   creating: ipfs/
  inflating: ipfs/ipfs
   creating: ipfs/dist/
  inflating: ipfs/dist/install.sh
  inflating: ipfs/dist/README.md
  inflating: ipfs/dist/LICENSE
[root@f1d0aa3022dc tmp]# ./ipfs/
dist/ ipfs
[root@f1d0aa3022dc tmp]# ./ipfs/ipfs version
ipfs version 0.3.4
@ChristianKniep
Copy link
Contributor Author

same goes for the 386 file.

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

@ChristianKniep yeah, we messed up on the tagging for that version.

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

We're currently on version 0.3.7, is there any particular reason you need version 0.3.5?

@ChristianKniep
Copy link
Contributor Author

0.3.5 is the last stable version to me. I opened an issue for that #1807 and put it in the README of my docker image: https://github.com/qnib/docker-ipfs

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 8, 2015

@ChristianKniep sucks. that sounds like CORS headers missing. replied in #1807.

@whyrusleeping where did we mess up? i see:

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 8, 2015

Oh, i see, we apparently failed to actually bump the version till fa23022 -- we could re tag it. i don't recall what happened.

@daviddias daviddias added the kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) label Jan 2, 2016
@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@ChristianKniep would updating your Docker image to use 0.3.10 and above work for you?

@ChristianKniep
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @diasdavid,

I updated the version but and it shows the correct version string. :)
Even though I am not able to bootstrap it with only one peer. But that's a ticket for another day.

Thanks and keep up the good work!

Happy 2016
Christian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants