Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crash with 'Could not resolve name' during fuse mount on OS X #3013

Closed
dokterbob opened this issue Jul 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Crash with 'Could not resolve name' during fuse mount on OS X #3013

dokterbob opened this issue Jul 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) topic/fuse Topic fuse

Comments

@dokterbob
Copy link
Contributor

dokterbob commented Jul 29, 2016

Version/Platform/Processor information (from ipfs version --all):

  • ipfs version 0.4.2-41c5e11 (repo version 3)
  • OS X 10.11.6
  • osxfuse 2.8.3 (FuseVersion: 27)

Type (bug, feature, meta, test failure, question): bug
Area (api, commands, daemon, fuse, etc): fuse
Priority (from P0: functioning, to P4: operations on fire): P4

Description:

$ ipfs daemon --mount
Initializing daemon...
Swarm listening on /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/4001
Swarm listening on /ip4/<private>/tcp/4001
Swarm listening on /ip4/<private>/tcp/4001
API server listening on /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/5001
Gateway (readonly) server listening on /ip4/0.0.0.0/tcp/8080
12:38:27.074 ERROR  fuse/ipns: looking up /ipns/<unresolvable_hash>: Could not resolve name. ipns_unix.go:98
12:38:27.074 ERROR       node: error mounting: Could not resolve name. mount_unix.go:101
Error: Could not resolve name.

Before (until about an hour ago) this worked fine. I have no idea how IPFS ended up trying to resolve this hash upon mounting. Starting the daemon without --mount works just fine. Let me know if I can help with further feedback.

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added topic/fuse Topic fuse kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) labels Aug 4, 2016
@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

@dokterbob thanks for reporting this!

Unfortunately, the fuse part of the codebase hasnt been prioritized for quite some time. It definitely needs some work. If you want to help dig into the code and try and help fix things, that would be very helpful. Otherwise, just keep reporting new issues as you encounter them so that we have a good idea of what to work on

@karlek
Copy link

karlek commented Aug 4, 2016

I had a similar problem. This comment helped me:
#2383 (comment)

@dokterbob
Copy link
Contributor Author

@karlek Thanks! This helped. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) topic/fuse Topic fuse
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants