Will the app still be a client or will it remain a viewer? #75
-
|
the app short description says it would be a client, the features says it is a viewer, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
The app will be more of a "frontend" than a client or a viewer, I suppose - in a similar vein to Newpipe. The plan is to be able to interact with Twitter, and retain as many features as possible as a standard Twitter app but without requiring an account, and keeping data private and local. Currently, the app supports subscriptions, grouping subscriptions, trends, and a fair bunch of standard view functionalities (media, profiles, etc.). More features should be expected in due time 😅 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
2 years on does this ideology still stand? Now with the 3.x updates the app has a great UI, and with most clients dying off, this & the Mastodon integration would make it a one stop shop. Thanks again |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
thank you very much for your answer. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The app will be more of a "frontend" than a client or a viewer, I suppose - in a similar vein to Newpipe. The plan is to be able to interact with Twitter, and retain as many features as possible as a standard Twitter app but without requiring an account, and keeping data private and local.
Currently, the app supports subscriptions, grouping subscriptions, trends, and a fair bunch of standard view functionalities (media, profiles, etc.). More features should be expected in due time 😅