Replies: 2 comments
-
That's overall a good idea. We could register the DNS names, but we wouldn't be able to "promise" connectivity when those names are used. Does this first step make sense to you ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
yep, makes sense. connectivity would obviously be the responsibility of an administrator. cool, just wanted to make sure no one has done anything like that before to avoid work duplication. thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This is a duplicate of a question I asked in the NPWG slack. I'm wondering if anyone has done (or thought about) CoreDNS integration with whereabouts (through an external plugin). The idea is to provide a stable hostname for each interface assigned by whereabouts and make CoreDNS resolve those hostnames. The main goal is to simplify interaction with multus+whereabouts interfaces from both inside and outside of a k8s clusters.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions