Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Unit testing should use mocking, not minikube #10

Open
kawaja opened this issue Sep 5, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Unit testing should use mocking, not minikube #10

kawaja opened this issue Sep 5, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@kawaja
Labels
testing

Comments

@kawaja
Copy link
Owner

kawaja commented Sep 5, 2020

Used a short-cut in unit testing by using minikube, so it's not really unit testing. Seems reasonable to use minikube for system testing, but should move to a mocking approach for unit testing.
@kawaja kawaja added the testing label Sep 5, 2020
@kawaja kawaja self-assigned this Sep 5, 2020
@kawaja
Copy link
Owner Author

kawaja commented Sep 23, 2022

removed some of the dependence on k3s/minikube and learned how to use mocking better in 13a74ac, but still dependent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kawaja kawaja

Labels
testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kawaja