-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Promote Sysctl to ga #26981
Promote Sysctl to ga #26981
Conversation
Deploy preview for kubernetes-io-vnext-staging processing. Building with commit 3d7aaef https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-vnext-staging/deploys/605d45cb1da3c30007d70084 |
/cc tengqm |
/assign |
/milestone 1.21 |
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ content_type: task | |||
--- | |||
|
|||
<!-- overview --> | |||
{{< feature-state for_k8s_version="v1.12" state="beta" >}} | |||
{{< feature-state for_k8s_version="v1.21" state="GA" >}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't think this "feature-state" makes a lot of sense here.
sysctl
is not a tool originating from the Kubernetes project and its usage cannot fall under a GA or Beta state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it was added in this PR:
#8804
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, I should remove it?
I tried to summarize the history of sysctls in kubernetes/enhancements#34 (comment)
What we have done in 1.21 is lock the feature gate to True and promote e2e test cases(which is in process).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't maintain this page, so i was just commenting.
sig-docs may have feedback on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The feature gates page lists Sysctls
as a feature. Is that incorrect?
/hold |
/sig node |
content/en/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/feature-gates.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/approve |
Hi @pacoxu, looks like this PR is waiting for the e2e promotion to conformance testing in kubernetes/kubernetes#99734 to remove the hold.
|
@reylejano Thanks for reminding |
@pacoxu Can you squash your commits and rebase |
Signed-off-by: pacoxu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Elana Hashman <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tengqm The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Squanshed and rebased. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: ef4f80fa02ae5551c4cb1d6a45cc03652ceeeef3
|
/hold cancel |
Wait for e2e promotion to conformance testing