Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Please show the SPF result too, if desired #462

Open
ell1e opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feature request: Please show the SPF result too, if desired #462

ell1e opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ell1e
Copy link

ell1e commented Oct 3, 2024

I tried out this addon, and it is an awesome security improvement given Thunderbird for some reason entirely ignores the Authentication-Results header!

However, when there's no DKIM header and an SPF softfail remarked in the Authentication-Results, then this addon currently just displays nothing. Instead of that, it would be nice if it actually displayed the SPF softfail since that seems like a pretty significant warning.

The addon options could maybe look something like this to make that easily configurable:

[ ] Verify DKIM signatures locally
[ ] Save result of the local verification
[ ] Show server DKIM check (Authentication-Results header)
[ ] Show server SPF check (Authentication-Results header)

I don't really care what the defaults are, but it would be nice if SPF results could be enabled this way.

@Oclair
Copy link

Oclair commented Oct 6, 2024

wonderful feature addition idea!

@lieser
Copy link
Owner

lieser commented Oct 7, 2024

Note that the add-on already has an option to show the DKIM header for all messages (https://github.com/lieser/dkim_verifier/wiki/Display-Options#show-dkim-header), which would allow you to see the SPF result in your case.

But I agree it probably makes sense to also add a new option in between the existing ones, that show the DKIM header if either a DKIM, SPF or DMARC result other than none is available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants