General: Improve user administration
#9533
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
client
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the user management components in an Angular application. Modifications include improved conditional rendering for creating and editing users, adjustments to form control initialization, and enhancements to user search functionality. The routing configuration has been refined to clarify the distinction between creating and editing users. Localization files have also been updated to reflect these changes, ensuring that user-facing strings are clear and specific. Overall, the updates focus on enhancing user experience and simplifying the management of user data. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.route.ts (2)
54-54: Approved: Improved clarity in route title.The change from 'createOrEditLabel' to 'editLabel' for the edit route's
pageTitleenhances clarity and aligns with the PR objective of refining the user experience. This distinction between creating and editing a user is a good improvement.Consider updating the corresponding localization files to ensure the new 'editLabel' key is properly translated in all supported languages.
Line range hint
1-62: Approved: Well-structured routing configuration with good practices.The overall routing configuration is well-structured and follows Angular best practices. It effectively prevents resolver caching, supports lazy loading, and promotes code reuse. The nested route structure for user management is clear and logical.
For consistency, consider using PascalCase for component names in the
componentproperties, aligning with the TypeScript naming convention for classes. For example:component: UserManagementUpdateComponentThis change would improve adherence to the coding guideline for PascalCase types (types:PascalCase).
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/user-management.json (1)
95-95: Approve with minor suggestion: Enhanced password tooltip.The updated password tooltip provides clearer guidance on password change restrictions, which aligns well with the PR's objectives. This improvement will help administrators understand the limitations for different user types.
Consider removing the comma after "Notice" for better grammatical correctness:
- "passwordTooltip": "This setting can only be changed for new users. Notice, that you can only change passwords for internal users.", + "passwordTooltip": "This setting can only be changed for new users. Notice that you can only change passwords for internal users.",src/main/webapp/i18n/de/user-management.json (1)
96-96: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Clear explanation of password change limitationsThe updated tooltip provides valuable information about password change limitations, using the required informal "du" form and gender-neutral language. This aligns well with the PR objectives and improves user administration clarity.
A minor suggestion to enhance clarity:
Consider rephrasing slightly for better flow:
- "Du kannst diese Einstellung nur für neue Nutzer:innen ändern. Bitte beachte, dass du nur Passwörter für interne Nutzer:innen ändern kannst." + "Du kannst Passwörter nur für neue, interne Nutzer:innen ändern. Für bestehende Nutzer:innen ist diese Einstellung nicht verfügbar."This rephrasing combines the two sentences, making the limitation more explicit and easier to understand at a glance.
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.ts (2)
236-236: LGTM: Improved form control initialization forinternalInputwith a minor suggestion.The change to initialize
internalInputwith{ value: this.user.internal, disabled: true }is a good practice. It correctly sets the initial value and disabled state of the form control.Consider updating the comment to be more specific:
internalInput: [{ value: this.user.internal, disabled: true }], // Initially disabled, will be conditionally enabled/disabled based on user.idThis provides clearer context for the subsequent logic.
238-243: LGTM: Good implementation of conditional logic forinternalInput, with a minor formatting issue.The added conditional logic for enabling/disabling the
internalInputform control based onthis.user.idis well-implemented. It correctly differentiates between new and existing users, allowing only new users to set the internal flag.There's a minor formatting inconsistency:
if (this.user.id !== undefined) { this.editForm.get('internalInput')?.disable(); // Artemis does not support to edit the internal flag for existing users } else { this.editForm.get('internalInput')?.enable(); // New users can either be internal or external }The indentation appears to be 4 spaces, while the rest of the file uses 2 spaces. Please adjust to maintain consistency with the file's formatting style.
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.html (3)
90-90: LGTM: Simplified form control bindingThe removal of
[(ngModel)]in favor of using onlyformControlNamefor the internal checkbox aligns with best practices for reactive forms in Angular. This change simplifies the form control binding and improves consistency.For even better consistency, consider updating the
nameattribute to match theformControlName:- <input class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" id="internal" name="internal" formControlName="internalInput" /> + <input class="form-check-input" type="checkbox" id="internal" name="internalInput" formControlName="internalInput" />
Line range hint
222-257: Remove redundant [(ngModel)] binding and LGTM on improved error handlingThe email input field still contains both
[(ngModel)]andformControlNamebindings. To avoid potential conflicts and align with best practices for reactive forms, remove the[(ngModel)]binding:- <input - id="email" - type="email" - class="form-control" - name="email" - [(ngModel)]="user.email" - formControlName="emailInput" - [minlength]="EMAIL_MIN_LENGTH" - required - [maxlength]="EMAIL_MAX_LENGTH" - email - /> + <input + id="email" + type="email" + class="form-control" + name="emailInput" + formControlName="emailInput" + [minlength]="EMAIL_MIN_LENGTH" + required + [maxlength]="EMAIL_MAX_LENGTH" + email + />The expanded error handling for the email field is a great improvement. It now provides more specific feedback for various validation scenarios, enhancing the user experience.
Line range hint
1-294: Suggestion: Comprehensive update for form control consistencyWhile the changes made in this file improve certain aspects of the user management form, there are inconsistencies in how form controls are handled throughout the template. To ensure robust form validation and submission, consider performing a comprehensive update of all form controls:
- Use
formControlNameconsistently for all form inputs, removing[(ngModel)]bindings.- Update
nameattributes to match their correspondingformControlNamevalues.- Ensure all form controls are properly defined in the component's form group.
- Review and update error handling for all form fields to match the improved email field error handling.
This comprehensive update will align the entire template with Angular's reactive forms best practices and improve overall form consistency and maintainability.
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.ts (2)
444-450: Improved search validation logicThe changes to the
loadAllmethod enhance the search functionality by validating the search term length. This can help reduce unnecessary API calls and provide better user feedback.Consider extracting the magic number '3' into a named constant for better maintainability:
+const MIN_SEARCH_LENGTH = 3; loadAll() { this.searchTerm = this.searchControl.value; - if (this.searchTerm.length >= 3 || this.searchTerm.length === 0) { + if (this.searchTerm.length >= MIN_SEARCH_LENGTH || this.searchTerm.length === 0) { this.searchInvalid = false; this.search.next(); } else { this.searchInvalid = true; } }
529-534: LGTM: New method for handling Enter key pressThe addition of the
onKeydownmethod improves user experience by allowing search initiation via the Enter key. The implementation follows Angular best practices for event handling.Consider using the
KeyboardEvent.keyenum for better type safety:- if (event.key === 'Enter') { + if (event.key === KeyboardEvent.key.Enter) {src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.html (2)
30-31: Improved input field responsivenessThe changes to the search input field enhance user interaction:
- Changing from
(focusout)to(blur)for triggeringloadAll()is a good choice for consistency.- Adding the
(keydown)event withonKeydown($event)allows for more responsive interactions.Consider implementing debounce functionality for the
onKeydownevent to optimize performance, especially ifloadAll()is resource-intensive:import { debounceTime, distinctUntilChanged } from 'rxjs/operators'; @Component({...}) export class UserManagementComponent { searchTerms = new Subject<string>(); ngOnInit() { this.searchTerms.pipe( debounceTime(300), distinctUntilChanged() ).subscribe(() => this.loadAll()); } onKeydown(event: any) { this.searchTerms.next(event.target.value); } }
Line range hint
248-443: Enhanced filter modal with improved user experienceThe changes to the filter modal significantly improve user interaction and filter management:
- Consistent structure across different filter types (roles, origins, registration numbers, and statuses).
- Addition of radio buttons for selecting all, none, or specific items in each category.
- Clear labeling and help icons for better user guidance.
These enhancements make the filtering process more intuitive and efficient.
To further improve accessibility, consider adding
aria-labelattributes to the radio buttons and checkboxes. For example:<input class="form-check-input" type="radio" (click)="selectAllRoles()" [checked]="this.filters.authorityFilter.size === this.authorityFilters.length && !this.filters.noAuthority" aria-label="{{ 'artemisApp.userManagement.filter.all' | artemisTranslate }}" />This change will make it easier for screen readers to understand the purpose of each input element.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.html (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.ts (5 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.route.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/de/user-management.json (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/en/user-management.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.route.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/user-management.json (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/**/*.json: German language translations should be informal (dutzen) and should never be formal (sietzen). So the user should always be addressed with "du/dein" and never with "sie/ihr".
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/user-management.json (2)
67-67: LGTM: Improved clarity for user editing.The addition of a specific "editLabel" for editing users enhances the user interface clarity and aligns well with the updated routing configuration. This change supports the PR's objective of improving user administration capabilities.
Line range hint
1-110: Summary: Focused improvements to user management localization.The changes in this file are well-aligned with the PR objectives. They enhance clarity for user editing and provide more detailed information about password change restrictions. These modifications contribute to improving the user administration experience without introducing any unintended side effects.
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/user-management.json (1)
67-67: LGTM: Appropriate label for editing usersThe new label "Nutzer:in bearbeiten" (Edit user) is clear and concise. It uses gender-neutral language, which is good practice. This change aligns with the PR objective of refining the user experience and distinguishing between creating and editing users.
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.ts (1)
233-233: LGTM: Improved form control initialization foractivatedInput.The change to initialize
activatedInputwith{ value: this.user.activated }is a good practice. It correctly sets the initial value of the form control to the user's current activation status, which is important for maintaining state when editing existing users.src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.html (1)
4-8: LGTM: Improved conditional rendering for headerThe use of
@ifand@elsedirectives for conditional rendering aligns with the coding guideline to use new Angular syntax. This change effectively differentiates between creating a new user and editing an existing user, enhancing the user experience.src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.ts (4)
105-105: LGTM: New property for search validationThe addition of the
searchInvalidproperty follows the correct naming convention and appears to be used for form validation in the search functionality.
455-459: LGTM: Improved parameter naming in trackIdentityThe change from
indexto_indexin thetrackIdentitymethod parameter is a good practice. It clearly indicates that the parameter is intentionally unused, which can help prevent linter warnings and improve code clarity.
Line range hint
1-534: Overall assessment: Improvements to user management functionalityThe changes in this file enhance the user management component by improving search functionality, error handling, and user experience. The modifications generally adhere to Angular best practices and the provided coding guidelines. A few minor suggestions have been made for further improvements, but overall, the changes are well-implemented and contribute positively to the component's functionality.
10-11: Verify the impact of removing debounceTimeThe removal of
debounceTimefrom RxJS imports might affect the search behavior. While this can make the search more responsive, it could potentially increase the number of API calls.Please confirm that this change doesn't lead to excessive API calls during user search. Consider running the following command to check for any remaining usage of
debounceTime:✅ Verification successful
Further Verification Required
The removal of
debounceTimedid not return any usages in theuser-managementcomponent. Please manually verify that this change does not lead to excessive API calls during user searches.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
rg 'debounceTime' src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/Length of output: 60
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.html (3)
Line range hint
444-450: Improved modal footer with clear actionsThe changes to the modal footer enhance user interaction:
- Addition of a "Close" button for dismissing the modal without applying changes.
- Styling the "Apply" button as the primary action, making it visually distinct.
- Consistent use of translation keys for internationalization.
These improvements provide users with clear options for completing their interaction with the filter modal.
Line range hint
1-450: Excellent use of new Angular syntax and well-structured templateThe overall structure and syntax of the template are commendable:
- Consistent use of the new Angular control flow syntax (
@ifand@fordirectives) throughout the template, aligning with the provided coding guidelines.- Well-organized and logical structure, making the template easy to read and maintain.
- Clear separation of concerns between different sections of the user management interface.
The template demonstrates good practices in Angular development and adheres to modern standards.
Line range hint
36-40: Simplified error message display logicThe condition for displaying the search error message has been streamlined, now directly using the
searchInvalidvariable. This change improves readability and maintainability of the template.Please ensure that the component's TypeScript file correctly manages the
searchInvalidstate. Run the following script to verify the implementation:✅ Verification successful
Verification of
searchInvalidImplementationThe
searchInvalidvariable is correctly managed within theuser-management.component.tsfile, ensuring that the error message display functions as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of searchInvalid in the component file # Test: Search for the searchInvalid property and its usage rg -A 10 'searchInvalid' src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management.component.tsLength of output: 811
src/main/webapp/app/admin/user-management/user-management-update.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/admin/user-management.component.spec.ts (1)
247-256: LGTM: Improved test setup and expectationsThe changes to the 'initFilters' test case are good improvements:
- The mock setup for
userService.queryis more comprehensive.- The new expectation ensures that
initFiltersdoesn't trigger any unnecessary queries, aligning with the PR objectives of improving efficiency.Consider adding a comment explaining why
userService.queryis expected to be called 0 times after initialization. This would improve the test's readability and make the intention clearer for future developers.Also applies to: 264-264
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/admin/user-management.component.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/admin/user-management.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/admin/user-management.component.spec.ts (4)
17-17: LGTM: ReactiveFormsModule import addedThe addition of ReactiveFormsModule import is appropriate, as it suggests that the component now uses reactive forms. This aligns with the PR objectives of improving user administration capabilities.
171-171: Verify the increased number of query callsThe expectation for
userService.querycalls has been changed fromtoHaveBeenCalledOnce()totoHaveBeenCalledTimes(2). While this aligns with the improvements mentioned in the AI-generated summary, it's important to ensure that this change is intentional and doesn't introduce unnecessary API calls.Could you please confirm if the increased number of query calls is expected behavior? If so, consider adding a comment explaining why two calls are now necessary.
Line range hint
1-586: Verify test coverage for user search functionalityThe test case for validating user search functionality has been removed. While this aligns with the mentioned enhancements to user search functionality, it's crucial to ensure that this functionality is still being tested, possibly in a different way or location.
Could you please confirm that the user search functionality is adequately tested elsewhere? If not, consider adding new test cases to maintain proper test coverage.
Line range hint
1-586: LGTM: Comprehensive test suite with good coverageThe overall structure and coverage of the test suite for UserManagementComponent are impressive. The modifications align well with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary, reflecting the changes made to the component.
As a final step, please verify that all new features, edge cases, and potential error scenarios introduced by the changes to the user administration capabilities are adequately covered by the test suite. This will ensure the robustness and reliability of the component.
Malekos74
added
deployment-error
| const spy = jest.spyOn(comp, 'initFilters'); | ||
| const initSpy = jest.spyOn(profileService, 'getProfileInfo').mockReturnValue(of(new ProfileInfo())); | ||
|
|
||
| comp.ngOnInit(); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); | ||
| expect(initSpy).toHaveBeenCalledOnce(); | ||
| expect(userService.query).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| expect(userService.query).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0); | |
| expect(userService.query).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); |
Checklist
General
Client
Motivation and Context
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Performance Review
Code Review
Manual Tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation