Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Improve spotless config for pre commit hook #9600

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 10, 2024

Conversation

krusche
Copy link
Member

@krusche krusche commented Oct 26, 2024

Some developers experience very long loading times when committing? The code analyzer takes a long time since a couple of versions ago.

We still have used -PspotlessFiles which was deprecated a while ago
image

This is just a simple config change. Please test if committing staged changes work faster now.

The whole approach works like that:

  1. husky installs a pre-commit hook
  2. the pre-commit hook invokes lint-staged (https://github.com/lint-staged/lint-staged)
  3. lint-staged uses the config in .lintstagedrc.js
  4. .lintstagedrc.js has 3 entries (prettier and eslint for client code) and linting.sh for server Java code
  5. linting.sh invokes spotless to automatically clean up Java code
  6. All linting should only run on staged files. If you have a small commit, it should be relatively fast. If you have a very large commit, it can take some time.

If there are any other ideas how to make the process faster, feel free to propose them as part of this PR

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the Spotless plugin configuration for improved code formatting targeting specific Java file directories.
    • Enhanced documentation within the build configuration for formatting commands.
    • Modified the linting.sh script to streamline the application of formatting tasks without processing specific files.

@krusche krusche marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2024 18:45
@krusche krusche requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2024 18:45
@krusche krusche added this to the 7.6.5 milestone Oct 26, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on updating the build.gradle and linting.sh files. The build.gradle file modifies the Spotless plugin configuration to specify particular directories for Java file formatting, enhancing clarity. It also includes commands for executing formatting checks. The linting.sh script has been significantly altered by removing the join_by function and the FILES variable, simplifying the script to directly invoke the Spotless task with a new property related to branch reference.

Changes

File Change Summary
build.gradle Updated Spotless configuration to target specific Java directories and added commands for usage.
linting.sh Removed join_by function and FILES variable; directly invokes ./gradlew spotlessApply with a new property.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant Gradle
    participant Spotless

    Developer->>Gradle: Run ./gradlew spotlessApply
    Gradle->>Spotless: Apply formatting to specified directories
    Spotless-->>Gradle: Formatting applied
    Gradle-->>Developer: Formatting complete
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
linting.sh (1)

1-3: Architecture Advice: Consider Caching Spotless Results

To improve performance while maintaining code quality, consider implementing a caching strategy for Spotless results.

Recommendations:

  1. Cache Spotless results in the CI pipeline
  2. Only rerun on files that have changed since the last check
  3. Consider using Gradle's build cache

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these caching strategies?

build.gradle (1)

58-66: LGTM! Configuration changes align with performance objectives.

The changes improve performance by:

  1. Explicitly targeting only Java source directories
  2. Properly excluding test resources, generated files, and other non-Java files

Consider these additional performance optimizations:

  1. Enable parallel execution for spotless tasks by adding:
spotless {
+    parallel = true
     java {
         target {
             // ... existing config ...
         }
     }
}
  1. Configure the maximum number of threads:
spotless {
+    parallelThreads = Runtime.runtime.availableProcessors()
     java {
         target {
             // ... existing config ...
         }
     }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e1c562 and 4217a79.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • build.gradle (1 hunks)
  • linting.sh (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
linting.sh (2)

3-3: ⚠️ Potential issue

Configuration: Avoid hardcoding branch reference

The script hardcodes 'develop' as the reference branch, which might not be suitable for all workflows or branch strategies.

Consider making the branch reference configurable:

-./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'
+# Use default branch from git config or fall back to 'develop'
+DEFAULT_BRANCH=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@' || echo "develop")
+./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom="$DEFAULT_BRANCH"

Let's verify the current branch strategy:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check repository's branch strategy
# Test 1: Verify default branch
echo "Default branch:"
git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "No default branch set"

# Test 2: List common base branches
echo "Most active branches:"
git branch -r --sort=-committerdate | head -n 5

3-3: ⚠️ Potential issue

Performance Regression: Script no longer processes only staged files

The current implementation runs spotlessApply on the entire codebase instead of only the staged files. This change appears to contradict the PR's objective of improving commit times, as it:

  1. Ignores the staged files passed by lint-staged
  2. Processes the entire codebase on every commit
  3. May actually increase commit times compared to the previous implementation

Consider reverting to processing only staged files:

-./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'
+# Accept staged files as arguments
+if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then
+    echo "No files provided"
+    exit 0
+fi
+
+# Process only staged files
+./gradlew spotlessApply -PspotlessFiles="$*"

Let's verify the impact on performance:

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on two main files: build.gradle and linting.sh. In build.gradle, the Spotless plugin configuration has been refined to specifically include Java files from designated directories, enhancing clarity and performance. Comments have been added for better understanding of the formatting commands. In linting.sh, the join_by function and Windows-specific path handling have been removed, simplifying the script. The script now directly applies formatting using a Gradle command with a new parameter, changing its operational focus.

Changes

File Change Summary
build.gradle Updated Spotless configuration to include specific Java file paths; added comments for clarity.
linting.sh Removed join_by function and FILES variable; eliminated Windows path handling; simplified to directly invoke ./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Gradle
    participant Spotless

    User->>Gradle: ./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'
    Gradle->>Spotless: Apply formatting to files in src/main/java and src/test/java
    Spotless-->>Gradle: Formatting complete
    Gradle-->>User: Formatting applied
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
linting.sh (1)

1-3: Document the script's behavior and requirements.

Add a comment block explaining:

  • The script's purpose in the pre-commit hook
  • The ratchet-based formatting approach
  • Required environment (Gradle)
 #!/bin/sh
 
+# Pre-commit hook script for Java code formatting
+# Uses Spotless with ratchet mode to format changes compared to base branch
+# Requirements:
+# - Gradle wrapper (./gradlew)
+# - Git repository
+
 ./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'
build.gradle (1)

58-66: LGTM! The Spotless configuration changes look good.

The refined file inclusion pattern that specifically targets Java files in src/main/java and src/test/java directories is a good optimization. This should help improve the performance of the pre-commit hook by reducing the scope of files that need to be processed.

Consider these additional performance optimizations:

  1. Add .gitignore patterns to the exclusions to avoid processing files that are already ignored:
 exclude(
+        "**/target/**",
+        "**/.git/**",
+        "**/.gradle/**",
         "**/src/test/resources/test-data/repository-export/EncodingISO_8559_1.java",
         "**/node_modules/**",
  1. Consider moving the Spotless configuration to a separate spotless.gradle file and applying it conditionally:
if (!project.hasProperty('skipFormat')) {
    apply from: 'gradle/spotless.gradle'
}

This allows bypassing formatting with ./gradlew -PskipFormat when needed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e1c562 and 4217a79.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • build.gradle (1 hunks)
  • linting.sh (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
linting.sh (1)

3-3: Verify performance improvement with the new configuration.

Let's confirm that the new ratchet-based approach improves commit performance compared to the previous implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the performance impact.


Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the ratchet configuration and its impact.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

The ratchet-based approach improves performance by only formatting changed files

The change from using -PspotlessFiles to -PratchetFrom='develop' is a performance improvement. The ratchet approach only formats files that have changed compared to the develop branch, rather than formatting all specified files. This is evidenced by:

  1. Recent commit messages showing intentional spotless optimization: "only apply spotless to changes from develop"
  2. Removal of complex file path handling code that was previously needed for -PspotlessFiles
  3. Simpler configuration that leverages Spotless's built-in ratchet functionality
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the old and new spotless configurations in the codebase

# Test 1: Check if we completely removed the deprecated parameter
echo "Checking for deprecated -PspotlessFiles usage:"
rg -l "PspotlessFiles" 

# Test 2: Verify the new ratchet configuration in build.gradle
echo -e "\nVerifying spotless configuration:"
rg -A 5 "spotless {" build.gradle

# Test 3: Look for any remaining Windows-specific path handling
echo -e "\nChecking for Windows path handling:"
rg -i "windows|cygwin|mingw" .

Length of output: 69635


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any performance-related configurations or changes in build files
echo "Checking build.gradle for spotless configuration:"
rg -A 10 "spotless {" build.gradle || rg -A 10 "spotless\s*{" build.gradle

echo -e "\nChecking for any performance-related comments or documentation:"
rg -i "performance|ratchet" -g "!*.{lock,log}" .

echo -e "\nChecking git history for previous spotless configurations:"
git log -p --all -S "spotlessFiles" -- "*.gradle" "*.sh"

Length of output: 87596


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for ratchet configuration and related changes
echo "Checking build.gradle for ratchet configuration:"
rg -A 10 "ratchet" build.gradle || rg -A 10 "spotless" build.gradle

echo -e "\nChecking for any ratchet-related files:"
fd -t f ratchet

echo -e "\nChecking for any spotless-related files:"
fd -t f spotless

echo -e "\nChecking for any performance-related comments in recent commits:"
git log -n 10 --grep="performance\|ratchet\|spotless" --pretty=format:"%h %s"

Length of output: 4971

linting.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2024

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. Therefore, this pull request has been automatically marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs within seven days. Thank you for your contributions.

@krusche krusche modified the milestones: 7.6.5, 7.7.0 Nov 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Nov 4, 2024
@krusche krusche merged commit 5a3ae27 into develop Nov 10, 2024
22 of 27 checks passed
@krusche krusche deleted the chore/improve-spotless branch November 10, 2024 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant