-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Development
: Improve spotless config for pre commit hook
#9600
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on updating the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant Gradle
participant Spotless
Developer->>Gradle: Run ./gradlew spotlessApply
Gradle->>Spotless: Apply formatting to specified directories
Spotless-->>Gradle: Formatting applied
Gradle-->>Developer: Formatting complete
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
linting.sh (1)
1-3
: Architecture Advice: Consider Caching Spotless ResultsTo improve performance while maintaining code quality, consider implementing a caching strategy for Spotless results.
Recommendations:
- Cache Spotless results in the CI pipeline
- Only rerun on files that have changed since the last check
- Consider using Gradle's build cache
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these caching strategies?
build.gradle (1)
58-66
: LGTM! Configuration changes align with performance objectives.The changes improve performance by:
- Explicitly targeting only Java source directories
- Properly excluding test resources, generated files, and other non-Java files
Consider these additional performance optimizations:
- Enable parallel execution for spotless tasks by adding:
spotless { + parallel = true java { target { // ... existing config ... } } }
- Configure the maximum number of threads:
spotless { + parallelThreads = Runtime.runtime.availableProcessors() java { target { // ... existing config ... } } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- build.gradle (1 hunks)
- linting.sh (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
linting.sh (2)
3-3
:⚠️ Potential issueConfiguration: Avoid hardcoding branch reference
The script hardcodes 'develop' as the reference branch, which might not be suitable for all workflows or branch strategies.
Consider making the branch reference configurable:
-./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop' +# Use default branch from git config or fall back to 'develop' +DEFAULT_BRANCH=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@' || echo "develop") +./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom="$DEFAULT_BRANCH"Let's verify the current branch strategy:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check repository's branch strategy # Test 1: Verify default branch echo "Default branch:" git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "No default branch set" # Test 2: List common base branches echo "Most active branches:" git branch -r --sort=-committerdate | head -n 5
3-3
:⚠️ Potential issuePerformance Regression: Script no longer processes only staged files
The current implementation runs
spotlessApply
on the entire codebase instead of only the staged files. This change appears to contradict the PR's objective of improving commit times, as it:
- Ignores the staged files passed by lint-staged
- Processes the entire codebase on every commit
- May actually increase commit times compared to the previous implementation
Consider reverting to processing only staged files:
-./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop' +# Accept staged files as arguments +if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then + echo "No files provided" + exit 0 +fi + +# Process only staged files +./gradlew spotlessApply -PspotlessFiles="$*"Let's verify the impact on performance:
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on two main files: Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Gradle
participant Spotless
User->>Gradle: ./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'
Gradle->>Spotless: Apply formatting to files in src/main/java and src/test/java
Spotless-->>Gradle: Formatting complete
Gradle-->>User: Formatting applied
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
linting.sh (1)
1-3
: Document the script's behavior and requirements.Add a comment block explaining:
- The script's purpose in the pre-commit hook
- The ratchet-based formatting approach
- Required environment (Gradle)
#!/bin/sh +# Pre-commit hook script for Java code formatting +# Uses Spotless with ratchet mode to format changes compared to base branch +# Requirements: +# - Gradle wrapper (./gradlew) +# - Git repository + ./gradlew spotlessApply -PratchetFrom='develop'build.gradle (1)
58-66
: LGTM! The Spotless configuration changes look good.The refined file inclusion pattern that specifically targets Java files in
src/main/java
andsrc/test/java
directories is a good optimization. This should help improve the performance of the pre-commit hook by reducing the scope of files that need to be processed.Consider these additional performance optimizations:
- Add
.gitignore
patterns to the exclusions to avoid processing files that are already ignored:exclude( + "**/target/**", + "**/.git/**", + "**/.gradle/**", "**/src/test/resources/test-data/repository-export/EncodingISO_8559_1.java", "**/node_modules/**",
- Consider moving the Spotless configuration to a separate
spotless.gradle
file and applying it conditionally:if (!project.hasProperty('skipFormat')) { apply from: 'gradle/spotless.gradle' }This allows bypassing formatting with
./gradlew -PskipFormat
when needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- build.gradle (1 hunks)
- linting.sh (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
linting.sh (1)
3-3
: Verify performance improvement with the new configuration.Let's confirm that the new ratchet-based approach improves commit performance compared to the previous implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the performance impact.
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the ratchet configuration and its impact.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
The ratchet-based approach improves performance by only formatting changed files
The change from using
-PspotlessFiles
to-PratchetFrom='develop'
is a performance improvement. The ratchet approach only formats files that have changed compared to the develop branch, rather than formatting all specified files. This is evidenced by:
- Recent commit messages showing intentional spotless optimization: "only apply spotless to changes from develop"
- Removal of complex file path handling code that was previously needed for
-PspotlessFiles
- Simpler configuration that leverages Spotless's built-in ratchet functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the old and new spotless configurations in the codebase # Test 1: Check if we completely removed the deprecated parameter echo "Checking for deprecated -PspotlessFiles usage:" rg -l "PspotlessFiles" # Test 2: Verify the new ratchet configuration in build.gradle echo -e "\nVerifying spotless configuration:" rg -A 5 "spotless {" build.gradle # Test 3: Look for any remaining Windows-specific path handling echo -e "\nChecking for Windows path handling:" rg -i "windows|cygwin|mingw" .Length of output: 69635
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any performance-related configurations or changes in build files echo "Checking build.gradle for spotless configuration:" rg -A 10 "spotless {" build.gradle || rg -A 10 "spotless\s*{" build.gradle echo -e "\nChecking for any performance-related comments or documentation:" rg -i "performance|ratchet" -g "!*.{lock,log}" . echo -e "\nChecking git history for previous spotless configurations:" git log -p --all -S "spotlessFiles" -- "*.gradle" "*.sh"Length of output: 87596
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for ratchet configuration and related changes echo "Checking build.gradle for ratchet configuration:" rg -A 10 "ratchet" build.gradle || rg -A 10 "spotless" build.gradle echo -e "\nChecking for any ratchet-related files:" fd -t f ratchet echo -e "\nChecking for any spotless-related files:" fd -t f spotless echo -e "\nChecking for any performance-related comments in recent commits:" git log -n 10 --grep="performance\|ratchet\|spotless" --pretty=format:"%h %s"Length of output: 4971
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. Therefore, this pull request has been automatically marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs within seven days. Thank you for your contributions. |
Some developers experience very long loading times when committing? The code analyzer takes a long time since a couple of versions ago.
We still have used
-PspotlessFiles
which was deprecated a while agoThis is just a simple config change. Please test if committing staged changes work faster now.
The whole approach works like that:
husky
installs apre-commit
hookpre-commit
hook invokeslint-staged
(https://github.com/lint-staged/lint-staged)lint-staged
uses the config in.lintstagedrc.js
.lintstagedrc.js
has 3 entries (prettier
andeslint
for client code) andlinting.sh
for server Java codelinting.sh
invokesspotless
to automatically clean up Java codelinting
should only run on staged files. If you have a small commit, it should be relatively fast. If you have a very large commit, it can take some time.If there are any other ideas how to make the process faster, feel free to propose them as part of this PR
Summary by CodeRabbit
linting.sh
script to streamline the application of formatting tasks without processing specific files.