Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When the version 1.8.0 or 2.0.0 is released? #376

Closed
junaruga opened this issue Oct 22, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed

When the version 1.8.0 or 2.0.0 is released? #376

junaruga opened this issue Oct 22, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@junaruga
Copy link
Contributor

Hi maintainers and @ioquatix

I see the new version "1.8.0" is set on lib/thin/version.rb while the current thin latest 1.x version is 1.7.2 [1].
When will we release the version 1.8.0 or 2.0.0?
I want to use the thin supporting RSpec 3, as the RPM package is managed on Fedora, required to run the tests on RSpec3 [2].

Thanks.

[1] https://rubygems.org/gems/thin
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-thin

@tagliala
Copy link

Hi,

another reason to cut a new release is #372 (TL;DR: thin stable does not build on macOS with XCode 12)

@ioquatix
Copy link
Collaborator

We will cut 1.8.0 and it will be the last maintenance release pending patch releases, hopefully before the end of the year.

@ioquatix
Copy link
Collaborator

If you want to help, you need to check, is the current master stable and reasonable to release, are there any outstanding PRs that should be merged, and do we need to update release notes.

@junaruga
Copy link
Contributor Author

junaruga commented Nov 4, 2020

Thanks! For the above thin RPM package in Fedora, we released the the current thin latest version 1.7.2's RPM package, applying some patch files to run the tests on RSpec 3.

@ioquatix
Copy link
Collaborator

I have released 1.8.0 please try it out and report back.

@krzysiek1507
Copy link

Hi @ioquatix. Could you please push a git tag for 1.8.0?

@ioquatix
Copy link
Collaborator

I pushed the v1.8.0 tag - sorry, it wasn't done automatically because the thin release process didn't seem to include it.

@krzysiek1507
Copy link

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants