Replies: 6 comments
-
I'm a big fan of https://sourcehut.org and generally use it for anything that doesn't require being in Github. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I definitely agree that there are platforms that could be much better than GitHub privacy-wise, and moving to one of those is an interesting prospect. I am not going to prioritise investigating it right now though, but will leave this issue here until I have the time to do so. Thanks for the suggestion! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am moving this to a discussion, as it is not really an issue with the program per se. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In addition, this would make it possible to build Reticulum on IPv6-only nodes. IPv6-only nodes are sometimes cheaper and sufficient - it would be nice if you could clone the Git repo there directly. +1 for codeberg.org |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 for codeberg |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks a lot for all the suggestions. For quite some time now, the main repositories for all Reticulum-related projects have actually been hosted on a private, self-hosted Gitea instance, and the GitHub repos are public mirrors of those. Anyone who has already contributed or wants to participate in Reticulum development are welcome to use this instance instead of GitHub, if the prefer to. Just contact me over LXMF or Matrix, and I can give you the details. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The project bills itself as private and resilient, yet hosts and issuetracks on GitHub, which is neither.
Suggestion: move to privately hosted GIT repo or at least Codeburg.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions