Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR: Allow to expose port for HA Add-On Version direct UI access #171

Closed
raihei opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

FR: Allow to expose port for HA Add-On Version direct UI access #171

raihei opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@raihei
Copy link

raihei commented Jan 13, 2024

Hi matt8707,

really a great project, thank you very much!

If possible it would be great to have the option to expose the add-on version container on a port, so the ha-fusion gui can be accessed without having the home-assistant gui around it. For example, for kiosk mode use on a tablet.

Or is there a way to do it, that I am not aware of?

regards
raihei

@matt8707
Copy link
Owner

@SilvanLaroo
Copy link

Awesome work! I tried the latest version, and I can access it via the specified port now. However, it seems it cannot connect to Home Assistant; I get an error: ERR_HASS_HOST_REQUIRED.

@matt8707
Copy link
Owner

  1. Open ingress, this registers hassUrl
  2. Profit

@jpleite
Copy link

jpleite commented Jan 20, 2024

hi @matt8707 I'm not able to access via URL. I can access my HA via local_url:8124 and via my domain. If i access local_url:8099 i get a ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED. Any hints?

@raihei
Copy link
Author

raihei commented Jan 20, 2024

@matt8707 Thank you for the really fast implementation of this feature!

@jpleite Did you enable the port in the configuration Tab of the Add-on and entered the port number?

@matt8707
Copy link
Owner

Yeah, discussion #222

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants