Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove channel disambiguation suffix #3428

Closed
rcarteraz opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3432
Closed

Remove channel disambiguation suffix #3428

rcarteraz opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #3432
Assignees
Labels
high-priority Issues that affect core functionality or are "show stoppers"

Comments

@rcarteraz
Copy link
Member

rcarteraz commented Mar 16, 2024

* Generate a short suffix used to disambiguate channels that might have the same "name" entered by the human but different

The channel disambiguation suffix is no longer necessary as all clients now have a channel editor available, allowing users to easily modify and manage channels. With this functionality in place, the additional suffix becomes redundant and can lead to confusion -- especially since it's not universally adopted by all clients. As a result, it is my recommendation to remove this feature to streamline the user experience.

@garthvh
Copy link
Member

garthvh commented Mar 16, 2024

I like this plan!

@thebentern
Copy link
Contributor

I completely agree. If @sachaw @andrekir are on board, I'm for removing this point of confusion.

@thebentern thebentern self-assigned this Mar 17, 2024
@thebentern thebentern added the high-priority Issues that affect core functionality or are "show stoppers" label Mar 17, 2024
@sachaw
Copy link
Member

sachaw commented Mar 17, 2024

Axe it

@andrekir
Copy link
Member

sure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
high-priority Issues that affect core functionality or are "show stoppers"
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants