Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cohttp-lwt: Don't leak asynchronous exceptions. #995

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mefyl
Copy link
Contributor

@mefyl mefyl commented Jul 29, 2023

Continuing the work of #992 .

@mseri
Copy link
Collaborator

mseri commented Aug 8, 2023

Thanks

@mseri mseri merged commit c45d3d3 into mirage:master Aug 8, 2023
mseri added a commit to mseri/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2023
…p-mirage, cohttp-lwt, cohttp-lwt-unix, cohttp-lwt-jsoo, cohttp-eio, cohttp-curl, cohttp-curl-lwt, cohttp-curl-async, cohttp-bench and cohttp-async (6.0.0~alpha2)

CHANGES:

- cohttp-lwt: Do not leak exceptions to `Lwt.async_exception_hook`. (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#992, mirage/ocaml-cohttp#995)
- http.header, cohttp, cohttp-eio: remove "first" and "move_to_first" and the special treatment of the "host" header (mseri mirage/ocaml-cohttp#988, mirage/ocaml-cohttp#986)
- http.header: introduce "iter_ord" to guarantee iteration following the order of the entries in the headers (mseri mirage/ocaml-cohttp#986)
- do not omit mandatory null Content-Length headers (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#985)
- cohttp-async, cohttp-curl-async: compatibility with core/async v0.16.0 (mseri, dkalinichenko-js mirage/ocaml-cohttp#976)
- cohttp-lwt server: call conn_closed before drainig the body of response on error (pirbo mirage/ocaml-cohttp#982)
- cohttp-eio: Relax socket interface requirement on `Server.connection_handler`. (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#983)
mseri added a commit to mseri/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2023
…p-mirage, cohttp-lwt, cohttp-lwt-unix, cohttp-lwt-jsoo, cohttp-eio, cohttp-curl, cohttp-curl-lwt, cohttp-curl-async and cohttp-async (6.0.0~alpha2)

CHANGES:

- cohttp-lwt: Do not leak exceptions to `Lwt.async_exception_hook`. (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#992, mirage/ocaml-cohttp#995)
- http.header, cohttp, cohttp-eio: remove "first" and "move_to_first" and the special treatment of the "host" header (mseri mirage/ocaml-cohttp#988, mirage/ocaml-cohttp#986)
- http.header: introduce "iter_ord" to guarantee iteration following the order of the entries in the headers (mseri mirage/ocaml-cohttp#986)
- do not omit mandatory null Content-Length headers (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#985)
- cohttp-async, cohttp-curl-async: compatibility with core/async v0.16.0 (mseri, dkalinichenko-js mirage/ocaml-cohttp#976)
- cohttp-lwt server: call conn_closed before drainig the body of response on error (pirbo mirage/ocaml-cohttp#982)
- cohttp-eio: Relax socket interface requirement on `Server.connection_handler`. (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#983)
nberth pushed a commit to nberth/opam-repository that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
…p-mirage, cohttp-lwt, cohttp-lwt-unix, cohttp-lwt-jsoo, cohttp-eio, cohttp-curl, cohttp-curl-lwt, cohttp-curl-async and cohttp-async (6.0.0~alpha2)

CHANGES:

- cohttp-lwt: Do not leak exceptions to `Lwt.async_exception_hook`. (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#992, mirage/ocaml-cohttp#995)
- http.header, cohttp, cohttp-eio: remove "first" and "move_to_first" and the special treatment of the "host" header (mseri mirage/ocaml-cohttp#988, mirage/ocaml-cohttp#986)
- http.header: introduce "iter_ord" to guarantee iteration following the order of the entries in the headers (mseri mirage/ocaml-cohttp#986)
- do not omit mandatory null Content-Length headers (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#985)
- cohttp-async, cohttp-curl-async: compatibility with core/async v0.16.0 (mseri, dkalinichenko-js mirage/ocaml-cohttp#976)
- cohttp-lwt server: call conn_closed before drainig the body of response on error (pirbo mirage/ocaml-cohttp#982)
- cohttp-eio: Relax socket interface requirement on `Server.connection_handler`. (mefyl mirage/ocaml-cohttp#983)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants