Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polishing #136

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2024
Merged

Polishing #136

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2024

Conversation

rkscv
Copy link

@rkscv rkscv commented Mar 24, 2024

Just found that spawning go env for each package is too expensive. We don't need to do that now.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved package version retrieval and display process.
    • Simplified temporary directory removal process.
    • Streamlined package information retrieval with updated version setting method.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2024

Walkthrough

These changes streamline the process of retrieving and displaying package versions in a Go project. By directly using the Current field from a version object instead of a separate function call, the code becomes more efficient and readable. Additionally, the removal and simplification of methods related to package version handling and temporary directory management in goutil.go further clean up the codebase, making it leaner and more maintainable.

Changes

File Summary
cmd/.../list.go Updated to use v.Version.Current for package version retrieval and display.
internal/.../goutil.go - Removed SetCurrentVer from Package.
- Simplified removeTmpDir in GoPaths.
- Updated version setting in GetPackageInformation.

🐇🎉
To the code that's lean and neat,
A rabbit hops on nimble feet.
With versions now so swiftly found,
Our code does more than just astound.
🌟 In every line, a magic spell,
With each commit, our spirits swell.
🥕 Cheers to changes, small and bright,
Our code now dances in the light.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 117823e and 7fda027.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • cmd/list.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/goutil/goutil.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
cmd/list.go (1)
  • 58-58: The change to use v.Version.Current directly for displaying package versions is a good optimization. Ensure that v.Version.Current is always correctly populated before this function is called to avoid displaying incorrect or empty version information.
internal/goutil/goutil.go (2)
  • 172-172: Simplifying the removeTmpDir method by directly returning the result of os.RemoveAll(gp.TmpPath) is a good cleanup. Ensure that gp.TmpPath is always correctly set and points to a valid temporary directory that can be safely removed.
  • 303-303: Directly setting pkg.Version.Current with info.Main.Version in the GetPackageInformation function aligns with the PR's objective to optimize performance. Ensure that info.Main.Version is always available and accurate.

@nao1215
Copy link
Owner

nao1215 commented Mar 24, 2024

@rkscv
Wow, thanks for the improvements.

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit 9f86d80 into nao1215:main Mar 24, 2024
11 checks passed
@rkscv rkscv deleted the polishing branch March 24, 2024 06:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants