Documentation license / copyright #769
peterhcharlton
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
Interesting, I didn't know that. I am not good with licenses and stuff - I just went with filling in the default fields. Could you make a PR to change it to a better alternative? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I've made PR #771 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Neurokit is licensed under the highly permissive MIT license, whereas its documentation has what appears to be a highly restrictive copyright notice:
By Dominique Makowski and the Team
© Copyright 2020–2022.
Might you consider licensing the documentation under a more permissive license, e.g. CC BY?
Personally, this would be helpful as I would be keen to contribute to the documentation, but I would be hesitant if a copyright notice was going to be applied to my contribution, which I would interpret as preventing me from sharing the documentation elsewhere.
Thanks for considering this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions