You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, we are unsure whether any problems could arise due to the fact that NLB are using the 2015 version of the Nordic Guidelines, while MTM are using the 2020 version. Since NLB and SPSM are looking into switching to the 2020 guidelines, we’re guessing that you’ve already given this some thought.
Do you think that any adjustments have to be made to the MathML guidelines in order for them not to collide with the 2020 Nordic Guidelines?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As per:
mathml-guidelines/src/latest.tex
Line 113 in d012f76
MTM request the use of the use of the element with a local namespace declaration instead of the prefixed variant <m:math> (see e.g. https://daisy.github.io/transitiontoepub/best-practices/mathML/mathMLBestPractices.html#analysis-and-recommendations.
However, we are unsure whether any problems could arise due to the fact that NLB are using the 2015 version of the Nordic Guidelines, while MTM are using the 2020 version. Since NLB and SPSM are looking into switching to the 2020 guidelines, we’re guessing that you’ve already given this some thought.
Do you think that any adjustments have to be made to the MathML guidelines in order for them not to collide with the 2020 Nordic Guidelines?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: