-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
creation of whatwg-stream repo and npm module #262
Comments
I'd love to be a part of this. Also: cc @devsnek |
A bit of bikeshedding: is it going to be |
what if we just put our modules in the open standards group repo, as a monorepo |
@devsnek I'd prefer we don't do that: the last time we talked about the monorepo idea in automation, it never really went anywhere, also, it would be difficult to mange the commit and release access if we start out as a monorepo. I'd suggest we start small and just manage the repo separately for a start, otherwise we may be stuck at getting the tooling and process ready instead of doing actual experimental work - just because things like Lerna exists doesn't mean there will be people doing the extra work to actually bootstrap everything. It's not going to be too late if we want to merge multiple repos into one later. |
I think monorepo are great if you want to have a single release and testing process. I don’t see how it would be the case for other standards-related modules. I proposed whatwg-stream because of readable-stream. I’m really not fond of the name, so any help in that regard is welcomed. |
+1 to a new repo for whatwg streams (whatever y'all wanna call it). |
+1 for creating the repo. +1 for @joyeecheung Perhaps we can update the |
Repo and team created! We can always change the name later on. |
I've renamed the |
I would like to create a repository, a team and a corresponding npm module named
whatwg-stream
, under the node org.See nodejs/open-standards#12 for more details.
cc @joyeecheung
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: