From d7894f3969fd3932eef57d9759f01282c7d76aa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:08:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] timers: use start instead of stop + start

Instead of calling stop + start from the refresh method
of Timeout, instead just call start as libuv already
calls stop if necessary.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18486
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
---
 lib/internal/timers.js | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/internal/timers.js b/lib/internal/timers.js
index aa061be3dbf845..df2a88558fd6e3 100644
--- a/lib/internal/timers.js
+++ b/lib/internal/timers.js
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ Timeout.prototype[refreshFnSymbol] = function refresh() {
     // Would be more ideal with uv_timer_again(), however that API does not
     // cause libuv's sorted timers data structure (a binary heap at the time
     // of writing) to re-sort itself. This causes ordering inconsistencies.
-    this._handle.stop();
     this._handle.start(this._idleTimeout);
   } else if (this[unrefedSymbol]) {
     getTimers()._unrefActive(this);