We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
both query and upsert interactively ask the user for confirmation after each batch of entries:
query
upsert
dsio/action/query.go
Line 310 in bd94164
dsio/action/upsert.go
Line 79 in bd94164
this is kind of silly, especially when batch-processing (large amounts of) data.
it should be removed or at least made optional.
if the intention is to make interactive use more covenient, it could maybe be enabled/disabled automatically enabled only for interactive sessions: https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Check_output_device_is_a_terminal#Go
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
👍 the url is very informative。 I will consider about batch-processing.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I would add to this an option to always overwrite output file to avoid having to interactively answer that too.
No branches or pull requests
both
query
andupsert
interactively ask the user for confirmation after each batch of entries:dsio/action/query.go
Line 310 in bd94164
dsio/action/upsert.go
Line 79 in bd94164
this is kind of silly, especially when batch-processing (large amounts of) data.
it should be removed or at least made optional.
if the intention is to make interactive use more covenient,
it could maybe be enabled/disabled automatically enabled only for interactive sessions:
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Check_output_device_is_a_terminal#Go
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: