Replies: 6 comments
-
Although I understand your suggestion, I don't think this should be done.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I understand this. there are security reasons and other policies. so it was only a suggestion if it is possible to do. may be a check box can be implemented where a user would choose if he or she wants to use a background service for updating NVDA. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would just like to reinforce my interest also in this functionality. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@fernando-jose-silva commented on 28 jul. 2017 22:25 CEST:
Still, do you think your administrators would allow you to have auto updating enabled for NVDA? They usually want you to ask for administrative privileges for a reason.
I don't think next or master should be used in protected corporate environments anyway. There is something to say for master, but Next would be a no go. Imagine a broken next build and you would be further from home.
I assume administrators could also whitelist NVDA? Still, I think this should not happen and this might be worth opening a separate issue. @jcsteh, thoughts about this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I don't think the use cases provided here (corporate environments) are valid, since administrators would normally disable such functionality due to wanting additional control over what gets installed. This is probably more relevant for home users so that updates just happen transparently for them, thus encouraging immediate install of updates. So, I think this is a valid feature, though possibly not for the original use case. However, it's very low priority, especially as it's hard to get this right (security would need to be considered very carefully) and I think there are bigger wins that should be considered first (applying most of the update before the restart). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I converted this from the coresponding issue. I also don't see why NVDA should be priviledged against other software that are also crucial but don't update without admin rights. I am using for example ABBYY Finereader and other very important software at work and I have to ask the admins for each of them to be updated. However, maybe there are other strong arguments, so I thought it might be worthy to still track the discussion here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I use NVDA also in corporate environment and always when a new version of NVDA becomes available, I must contact our IT department "helpdesk" when I wanted to update NVDA.
I would not have suggested this if I have not observed, that some programs like Mozilla applications do not need administrative rights to update themselves.
Expected behavior:
NVDA can be (self)updated without entering an administrative credentials.
Actual behavior:
When NVDA updates itself, you must enter an administrative credentials.
System configuration:
NVDA version:
2017.2 and next snapshots
NVDA Installed or portable:
installed
Other information:
Windows version:
w10 1703 with latest updates installed
thx for your good work.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions