Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Has there been any omission in the code for organizing RTCP NACK packets? #2959

Closed
Lei-Xiangyu opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2966
Closed

Has there been any omission in the code for organizing RTCP NACK packets? #2959

Lei-Xiangyu opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2966
Assignees
Labels
TransByAI Translated by AI/GPT. WebRTC WebRTC, RTC2RTMP or RTMP2RTC.

Comments

@Lei-Xiangyu
Copy link

Lei-Xiangyu commented Mar 8, 2022

Note: Before asking a question, please read the FAQ (Please read FAQ before filing an issue) #2716

Is the first packet that exceeds the blp range after a nack packet pid missing?

Please describe the issue you encountered.

image
Did you forget to process this sequence after the first (sn - pid) > 16 here?

TRANS_BY_GPT3

@winlinvip winlinvip added the WebRTC WebRTC, RTC2RTMP or RTMP2RTC. label Mar 12, 2022
@chen-guanghua
Copy link
Contributor

chen-guanghua commented Mar 13, 2022

Confirmed, after determining (sn - pid) > 16, no processing was done on seq.

TRANS_BY_GPT3

@chen-guanghua
Copy link
Contributor

chen-guanghua commented Mar 13, 2022

The problem has been fixed and the PR has been submitted for this issue: #2966.

TRANS_BY_GPT3

@winlinvip
Copy link
Member

Merged. Thanks 👍

@winlinvip winlinvip changed the title 整理rtcp的nack包的代码是否出现了遗漏 Has there been any omission in the code for organizing RTCP NACK packets? Jul 28, 2023
@winlinvip winlinvip added the TransByAI Translated by AI/GPT. label Jul 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
TransByAI Translated by AI/GPT. WebRTC WebRTC, RTC2RTMP or RTMP2RTC.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants