-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Checksums: Implement RFC 3230 #22711
Comments
Nice - I was not aware of this - THX |
We should have a look at this RFC and see how this fits into our requirements for the followup implementations regarding checksum handling on the server. |
@moscicki fyi, what do you think about this? |
Ok, I think this went out of scope for now. |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
This enhancement will implement compliance with RFC 3220 which is about how client and server negotiate a checksum over the request/reply body.
Expected behaviour
Server should follow RFC 3230. That means in a nutshell:
The server checks requests for the existance of the header
Want Digest
. If it is there, the server adds a header value to the reply with the checksum asked for.Actual behaviour
It does not happen. If the server has a checksum it is only returned on PROPFIND and GET as described in #18716
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: