We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
all
none
I suggest to add the version schemes all and none that are defined as follows:
There is just one possible form: vers:all/*. It matches all versions. A comparison whether a version is within the range always results true.
vers:all/*
true
Use case: E.g. an affected EOL product that will never be fixed.
There is just one possible form: vers:none/*. It matches no version. A comparison whether a version is within the range always results in false.
vers:none/*
false
Use case: Sometimes people as a negated question - e.g. 'Which versions are affected?' Answer: None.
Flagging @pombredanne for attention
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I suggest to add the version schemes
all
andnone
that are defined as follows:all
There is just one possible form:
vers:all/*
. It matches all versions. A comparison whether a version is within the range always resultstrue
.Use case: E.g. an affected EOL product that will never be fixed.
none
There is just one possible form:
vers:none/*
. It matches no version. A comparison whether a version is within the range always results infalse
.Use case: Sometimes people as a negated question - e.g. 'Which versions are affected?' Answer: None.
Flagging @pombredanne for attention
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: