Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add easy review tool for registered bootnodes on the DHT #7385

Open
skunert opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Add easy review tool for registered bootnodes on the DHT #7385

skunert opened this issue Jan 29, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@skunert
Copy link
Contributor

skunert commented Jan 29, 2025

After we have #1825, we should provide some tooling that allows to show the registered bootnodes on the DHT.

I imagine some CLI tool where I just specify the network, it then fetches the list of bootnodes form the relay chain and translates it via req-response protocol to the actual addresses of interest. Then it would just print a simple table. This could be useful for debugging and parachain node operators.

Up for debate: This could also be a subcommand of the node.

@skunert skunert moved this to Milestone 1 in Polkadot Omni Node Jan 29, 2025
@skunert skunert moved this from Milestone 1 to Milestone 2 in Polkadot Omni Node Jan 29, 2025
@MrishoLukamba
Copy link
Contributor

I am up to take it, if it will be passed. And yes This will actually bring ease for debugging network-related issues, mostly on network topology

@eskimor
Copy link
Member

eskimor commented Jan 31, 2025

Probably would make sense to make part of introspector .. so we have everything in one place? @alexggh @AndreiEres what do you think?

@alexggh
Copy link
Contributor

alexggh commented Jan 31, 2025

Probably would make sense to make part of introspector .. so we have everything in one place? @alexggh @AndreiEres what do you think?

Yes, I think it could easily fit into the whois command here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-introspector/blob/master/whois/README.md, till now we used this only for queries about validators, but I see no reason why it can't do the same for collators.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Milestone 2
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants