Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about creation of multiple links #136

Closed
cecio opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Question about creation of multiple links #136

cecio opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@cecio
Copy link

cecio commented Feb 3, 2021

Hello.

I often have the need to create 2-3 links for the same password, if I need to share it with more people. Right now I have to make the procedure multiple times.

I'm implementing a little mod to add a "# of links" field (just below the ttl), so that the resulting page will show me all the links that I can C&P somewhere else.
Are you interested in a pull request?

Thanks,

@cecio
Copy link
Author

cecio commented Feb 3, 2021

May be I add a couple of screenshot to make it more clear :-)

image

image

@jparise
Copy link
Collaborator

jparise commented Feb 3, 2021

This hasn't come up before, but it does sound like it could be useful. I suspect most people that have the need for multiple links just go through the process multiple times, as you note.

If we were to implement this, we'd want to put some upper bound (e.g. 5?) on the number of links that could be created, so the usefulness of this feature would be capped at that number. For other "bulk" creation cases, something like the API proposed in #51 would be a better fit.

@cecio
Copy link
Author

cecio commented Feb 3, 2021

I totally agree with you, we can cap it to a relatively low number. Higher numbers require automation.

@cecio
Copy link
Author

cecio commented Feb 3, 2021

OK, so if you think it's useful, I'll go ahead in clean it up a bit and I'll make a pull request.

@jparise
Copy link
Collaborator

jparise commented Feb 5, 2021

Sorry for the delay, and thanks for sending along the proposed changes in #137.

For the moment, our preference is to keep the system and its code simple and focused on vending a single link at a time. The "multiple links" use case hasn't come up very often, and there is a manual "workaround" for the times when it does.

Limiting the number of features we provide makes this project easier to maintain and audit, given that it is a security product.

@cecio
Copy link
Author

cecio commented Feb 5, 2021

OK, I understand your point, no problem.
Thanks,

@jparise jparise closed this as completed Feb 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants