-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
parcoords documentation mentions non-existent property #1298
Comments
Thanks for the report @skylogic004! Reporting docs issues here is fine, and then we can sort out the source of the error. In this case, it will need to be addressed in plotly.js, because that's where the master schema for all of the figure properties is maintained. I've opened an issue over there at plotly/plotly.js#3313. I'm going to close this issue since plotly.py will automatically get the documentation updates once they are implemented and released in plotly.js. Thanks again for taking the time to bring this up! |
There still seems to be some difference between what is listed in the docs and what is available in the API. For example, the docs suggest a way to change properties of the coordinate labels: However, using these results in an error:
It would be quite nice to actually have these features, so this may not be a docstring error, but a problem with exposing the method. |
Hi @JamesPHoughton, These properties are coming in plotly.py 4.1.0. They were just released in Plotly.js 1.49.0 a couple weeks ago. I guess the docs got ahead of us! You can install version 4.1.0rc1 (released yesterday) if you'd like to try them out now. |
You just made my day. =) |
We're working on a way of locking the Py docs and Py versions more tightly together so this kind of thing doesn't happen any more... sorry for the confusion! |
In the documentation for the
parcoords
chart, under thedimensions
section, intickvals
andticktext
it says:However, I've read the entire documentation for parcoords and there is no
tickmode
property (except in thecolorbar
section which is unrelated).So, if I'm understanding correctly, then the documentation is wrong. Probably a copy+paste bug where someone forgot to remove the reference to tickmode?
p.s. is this the right place to report documentation issues? or only code issues?
p.p.s. it's also possible that this is a code issue, meaning that the tickmode was supposed to exist in the code but doesn't.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: