You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I understand the docs correctly then componentName may refer to either (I'm using BEM terminology here) block, element or modifier.
What I have is kind of a different style than the classic BEM where we write MultiNamedBlock__contained-element--with-modifier.
This means that I can't really differentiate between blocks, elements or modifiers.
Event if I supply something like this (?:block_pattern|element_pattern|modifier_pattern) it might be able to match invalid-block-name__WithElement--AndModifier in initial or combined even though we consider it invalid.
I'm proposing a way to supply different patterns that can be interpolated in initial and combined.
Something like this:
The structure of componentName can be dynamic to support for SUIT terminology, unless there's a way to categorize both of them in a way that makes sense to everyone 😃
Again, if there's a way to achieve this right now and I'm missing something I'd be happy to know!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I understand the docs correctly then
componentName
may refer to either (I'm using BEM terminology here)block
,element
ormodifier
.What I have is kind of a different style than the classic BEM where we write
MultiNamedBlock__contained-element--with-modifier
.This means that I can't really differentiate between blocks, elements or modifiers.
Event if I supply something like this
(?:block_pattern|element_pattern|modifier_pattern)
it might be able to matchinvalid-block-name__WithElement--AndModifier
ininitial
orcombined
even though we consider it invalid.I'm proposing a way to supply different patterns that can be interpolated in
initial
andcombined
.Something like this:
The structure of
componentName
can be dynamic to support for SUIT terminology, unless there's a way to categorize both of them in a way that makes sense to everyone 😃Again, if there's a way to achieve this right now and I'm missing something I'd be happy to know!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: