Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make Pod affinity configurable #155

Closed
adrianmo opened this issue Apr 2, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Make Pod affinity configurable #155

adrianmo opened this issue Apr 2, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Prabhaker24
Labels
kind/feature New feature priority/P2 Slight inconvenience or annoyance to applications, system continues to function status/ready The issue is ready to be worked on; or the PR is ready to review

Comments

@adrianmo
Copy link
Contributor

adrianmo commented Apr 2, 2019

At this moment, Pod affinity is configured as a soft requirement (PreferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution) that tells the schedule to try placing pods of the same kind to different hosts. This configuration might be suitable for some environments and use cases, but it might not be optimal for others.

We should expose the affinity rules to be applied to BK, SS, and CC to allow users to customize and optimize pod scheduling for their use case and environment.
@adrianmo adrianmo added status/ready The issue is ready to be worked on; or the PR is ready to review kind/feature New feature labels Apr 2, 2019
@adrianmo adrianmo mentioned this issue Apr 2, 2019
Closed
@adrianmo adrianmo added area/API Issue related to the custom resource API area/controller Issue related to the operator controller priority/P2 Slight inconvenience or annoyance to applications, system continues to function labels May 30, 2019
@pbelgundi pbelgundi removed area/API Issue related to the custom resource API area/controller Issue related to the operator controller labels May 6, 2020
@Prabhaker24
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this issue as we have an issue already for the same thing link to it #364.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Prabhaker24 Prabhaker24

Labels
kind/feature New feature priority/P2 Slight inconvenience or annoyance to applications, system continues to function status/ready The issue is ready to be worked on; or the PR is ready to review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@adrianmo @pbelgundi @Prabhaker24