Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proof generation parallelization #1615

Closed
2 tasks done
0xmad opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1627
Closed
2 tasks done

Proof generation parallelization #1615

0xmad opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1627
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@0xmad
Copy link
Collaborator

0xmad commented Jun 25, 2024

As a user I'd like to parallelize proof generation to improve speed of overall process.

  • Research if it's possible to use workers for proof generation: better to use promise all because proof generation groth16 is already implemented worker logic and doesn't make sense to wrap it in a web worker again. Plus, using I/O operations is optimized better than trying to put it into a web worker
  • Try to generate different proofs with forking and then combine the results
@0xmad 0xmad added this to MACI Jun 25, 2024
@0xmad 0xmad self-assigned this Jun 25, 2024
@0xmad 0xmad converted this from a draft issue Jun 25, 2024
@0xmad 0xmad added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2024
@0xmad 0xmad moved this from Todo to Backlog in MACI Jul 1, 2024
@0xmad 0xmad moved this from Backlog to In Progress in MACI Jul 1, 2024
@0xmad 0xmad mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2024
5 tasks
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in MACI Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant