Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @octokit/webhooks-types to v7.6.1 #9

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 3, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@octokit/webhooks-types 7.4.0 -> 7.6.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

octokit/webhooks (@​octokit/webhooks-types)

v7.6.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • add missing property category.node_id to discussion and discussion_comment (#​960) (049c104)

v7.6.0

Compare Source

Features
  • schemas: added schema for the merge_group destroyed event (#​962) (524ed0d)

v7.5.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v7.5.0

Compare Source

Features

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency @octokit/webhooks-types to v7.5.0 Update dependency @octokit/webhooks-types to v7.5.1 Apr 22, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency @octokit/webhooks-types to v7.5.1 Update dependency @octokit/webhooks-types to v7.6.1 Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants