Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exploded view for mutli-color #13668

Open
The-Original-Reth opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Exploded view for mutli-color #13668

The-Original-Reth opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@The-Original-Reth
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to see PrusaSlicer incorporate exploded view when doing multi-material prints.

Describe how it would work
Currently Bamboo Slicer and Orca Slicer allow for an "assembly view". What this does is explodes a multi object/part model so that one can paint the individual files without having to deal with the paint brush.
To my knowledge this works on a single file (obj, step, etc.) with multiple objects, or multiple files incorporated at a single time.

exploded view

@u89djt
Copy link

u89djt commented Nov 26, 2024

(Fellow user who recognizes that you can achieve what you need, though not precisely what you asked for there)
When you right click a single stl that contains multiple bodies intended for different colours, you can select "split to parts" and you can then set the tool for each part. The parts will stay in their original positions. Use the tool drop-down menu for each part in the objects/parts list.

@u89djt
Copy link

u89djt commented Nov 26, 2024

When I loaded the set of stls into prusaslicer it gave me the option of placing them as parts of a single object, so they were already separately coloured.
image

@The-Original-Reth
Copy link
Author

I understand this. However, I think you might be missing the improvement. While the turtle only have 4 parts, there are others which contain many more. And, being able to see an exploded view and color the parts on an exploded view would be highly beneficial. While the current workflow seems to be okay, Why not improve, especially if it is already being used by others. Such that the future workflow is better.

@u89djt
Copy link

u89djt commented Nov 26, 2024

Absolutely. Not what you asked for.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants