We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
using the EMA as stop loss does not seem a good option, % can be used instead.
Also a mix of the two can be used, % but variant depending on EMA, or EMA but limited to certain amounts.
Needs kind of fine-tuning and limits, because there are extreme target and stop losses.
However, the RRATIO is still a good option for statistical calculations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
using the EMA as stop loss does not seem a good option, % can be used instead.
Also a mix of the two can be used, % but variant depending on EMA, or EMA but limited to certain amounts.
Needs kind of fine-tuning and limits, because there are extreme target and stop losses.
However, the RRATIO is still a good option for statistical calculations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: