Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore some mypy issues #8516

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

Ignore some mypy issues #8516

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 8, 2024

Conversation

NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 8, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8516

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 6 New Failures, 12 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6263759 with merge base e2aff7e (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit e24b3c4 into pytorch:main Jul 8, 2024
47 of 65 checks passed
@NicolasHug NicolasHug deleted the mypy-ignore branch July 8, 2024 10:10
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added.
The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D60596227

fbshipit-source-id: 71b70e3277bf98897f378bc8f2324cd34a3e5146
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants