You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a follow-up question to #261, I'd like to be able to use bubblewrap to isolate the different callr subprocesses coming from the same parent process. Currently it seems all callr::r calls will reference the same .so files and read inputs and write outputs to the same temporary folder.
Would it be possible to store the reused files in a separate folder (so that that one can be mounted read-only), and the input/output files in another folder so that that one can be mounted read-write separately?
Additionally would it be possible to have an easy way to know and/or configure where those are located?
There are probably cross-platform concerns there too maybe, although I am not sure whether many folders vs one is so big of a deal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a follow-up question to #261, I'd like to be able to use
bubblewrap
to isolate the differentcallr
subprocesses coming from the same parent process. Currently it seems allcallr::r
calls will reference the same.so
files and read inputs and write outputs to the same temporary folder.Would it be possible to store the reused files in a separate folder (so that that one can be mounted read-only), and the input/output files in another folder so that that one can be mounted read-write separately?
Additionally would it be possible to have an easy way to know and/or configure where those are located?
There are probably cross-platform concerns there too maybe, although I am not sure whether many folders vs one is so big of a deal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: