Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Optimize subquery decorrelation in calcite. #521

Closed
Tracked by #278
liurenjie1024 opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #278

Optimize subquery decorrelation in calcite. #521

liurenjie1024 opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@liurenjie1024

Comments

@liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor

liurenjie1024 commented Feb 24, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Currently calcite's subquery decorrelator generates plan with too much nested loop join, and we need to figure out a way to optimize it.
@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 mentioned this issue Feb 24, 2022
Closed
2 tasks
@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 self-assigned this Feb 24, 2022
@liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

After some investigation, we should port flink's implementation to our system.

This was referenced Feb 28, 2022
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2022
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@liurenjie1024