Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about results #1

Open
asher-stern opened this issue Mar 22, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Question about results #1

asher-stern opened this issue Mar 22, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@asher-stern
Copy link

Hi.
Thank you for sharing your code.
I tried it. Technically it works fine. However, I am puzzled when examining its results.

I've generated two score files, almost identical. Only 4 scores out of 10000 are different, and the difference is very small. Nevertheless, when comparing alg2.txt to alg1.txt (alg2 is the first argument), I get very small values of epsilon. This is the case for various values of alpha, big and small ones. This means that the comparison software concludes that in a very high confidence alg2 is better than alg1. However, the reasonable conclusion should be that there is no difference and no edge to any of the score files.

Similarly, when I compare a score file to itself (say alg1 to alg1), it prints "The denominator is 0" but returns a result, and that result is that epsilon is very small for the first algorithm. Again, this makes no sense since it compares the same score-file to itself. Epsilon should be 0.5 in such a case.

The files are attached here (see below).

Thank you very much in advance.

alg1.txt
alg2.txt

@helboukkouri
Copy link

Hi @asher-stern ,

I don't know if this will help you but you may want to try the fix in #2 and check if it solves your issue :)

Hicham

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants