Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

changelog parser failed on ffi gem #165

Closed
zzak opened this issue Dec 27, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

changelog parser failed on ffi gem #165

zzak opened this issue Dec 27, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@zzak
Copy link
Member

zzak commented Dec 27, 2012

Using ruby-trunk at r38573, rdoc --version 4.0.0.preview2.1 from trunk.

installing default ffi_c libraries

Successfully installed ffi-1.2.0
Parsing documentation for ffi-1.2.0
Parsing sources...
Before reporting this, could you check that the file you're documenting         
has proper syntax:

  /usr/local/bin/ruby -c ext/ffi_c/libffi/ChangeLog

RDoc is not a full Ruby parser and will fail when fed invalid ruby programs.

The internal error was:

    (NoMethodError) undefined method `<' for nil:NilClass

ERROR:  While executing gem ... (NoMethodError)
    undefined method `<' for nil:NilClass
@drbrain drbrain closed this as completed in 6dd8d41 Jan 4, 2013
@drbrain
Copy link
Member

drbrain commented Jan 4, 2013

Also, FFI shouldn't be exposing this directory to RDoc, it doesn't contain anything useful, I'll submit a pull request.

drbrain referenced this issue in drbrain/ffi Jan 4, 2013
@drbrain
Ignore the libffi directory for RDoc
26b6e5d 
This directory does not contain useful documentation for rubyists so
RDoc should be told to ignore it.

See also rdoc/rdoc#165
@drbrain drbrain mentioned this issue Jan 4, 2013
Merged
@zzak
Copy link
Member Author

zzak commented Jan 4, 2013

👍 Thanks Eric!
/cc @ko1 reported this one on irc

ghost referenced this issue in ffi/ffi Jan 4, 2013
@drbrain @vp-of-awesome
Ignore the libffi directory for RDoc
49272de 
This directory does not contain useful documentation for rubyists so
RDoc should be told to ignore it.

See also rdoc/rdoc#165
@machu machu mentioned this issue May 11, 2013
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@drbrain @zzak