diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs
index 3619d02438da1..ac0685994eabf 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs
@@ -320,22 +320,25 @@ fn impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation<'a, 'cx, 'tcx>(
         let mut errors = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(infcx);
         errors.pop().map(|err| err.obligation)
     } else {
-        obligations.iter().cloned().find(|obligation| {
-            // We use `evaluate_root_obligation` to correctly track intercrate
-            // ambiguity clauses. We cannot use this in the new solver.
-            let evaluation_result = selcx.evaluate_root_obligation(obligation);
-
-            match evaluation_result {
-                Ok(result) => !result.may_apply(),
-                // If overflow occurs, we need to conservatively treat the goal as possibly holding,
-                // since there can be instantiations of this goal that don't overflow and result in
-                // success. This isn't much of a problem in the old solver, since we treat overflow
-                // fatally (this still can be encountered: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105231>),
-                // but in the new solver, this is very important for correctness, since overflow
-                // *must* be treated as ambiguity for completeness.
-                Err(_overflow) => false,
-            }
-        })
+        obligations
+            .iter()
+            .find(|obligation| {
+                // We use `evaluate_root_obligation` to correctly track intercrate
+                // ambiguity clauses. We cannot use this in the new solver.
+                let evaluation_result = selcx.evaluate_root_obligation(obligation);
+
+                match evaluation_result {
+                    Ok(result) => !result.may_apply(),
+                    // If overflow occurs, we need to conservatively treat the goal as possibly holding,
+                    // since there can be instantiations of this goal that don't overflow and result in
+                    // success. This isn't much of a problem in the old solver, since we treat overflow
+                    // fatally (this still can be encountered: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105231>),
+                    // but in the new solver, this is very important for correctness, since overflow
+                    // *must* be treated as ambiguity for completeness.
+                    Err(_overflow) => false,
+                }
+            })
+            .cloned()
     }
 }