-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A big performance regression in benchmarks #70785
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
9e55101 is in the queue: https://perf.rust-lang.org/status.html. |
For the record, this is the single-PR perf comparison showing the regression from #69718. @arlosi Two things I'm seeing:
|
We have perf data for the fix (#70803), which at a glance looks right. Before the regression to after the fix looks like noise, and so does after the regression to before the fix, so I believe this confirms the fix is complete. For the cost of MD5 hashing compared to SipHash, based on the changes to |
rustc performance data shows a pretty big regression between 74bd074e and 6050e52. I don't know if this is expected, but I'm putting this out there in case others see the dent in perf charts and wonder what had happened.
EDIT(@eddyb): we how have a single-PR perf comparison showing the regression for #69718.
#70156, the other PR in the range, is much more of a mixed bag (but only for a small subset of runs).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: