-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verify that allocations output by GVN are sufficiently aligned. #127399
Conversation
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <[email protected]>
@bors r+ rollup |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120248 (Make casts of pointers to trait objects stricter) - rust-lang#127355 (Mark format! with must_use hint) - rust-lang#127399 (Verify that allocations output by GVN are sufficiently aligned.) - rust-lang#127460 (clarify `sys::unix::fd::FileDesc::drop` comment) - rust-lang#127467 (bootstrap: once_cell::sync::Lazy -> std::sync::LazyLock) Failed merges: - rust-lang#127357 (Remove `StructuredDiag`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127399 - cjgillot:issue-127396, r=oli-obk Verify that allocations output by GVN are sufficiently aligned. Fixes rust-lang#127396 r? `@oli-obk`
@rust-timer build 5b9176f |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (5b9176f): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary -7.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.5%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 701.941s -> 701.705s (-0.03%) |
Fixes #127396
r? @oli-obk