fg-prompt3_2.txt

Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Example Document:
Novak Djokovic remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American Tommy Paul in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with Stefanos Tsitsipas. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting Paul in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian Karen Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1:
Stefanos Tsitsipas won against American Tommy Paul in the Australian Open semifinals.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: No, the summary is not factually correct.


Example Summary 2:
A Serbian tennis player beat an American tennis player in the Australian Open semifinals.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: Yes, the summary is factually correct.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: [ARTICLE]

Summary: [SUMMARY_SENTENCES]

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: