Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scx_lavd: Clean up task state transition tracking #199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

htejun
Copy link
Contributor

@htejun htejun commented Mar 26, 2024

scx_lavd was implementing custom task state transition tracking to avoid updating statistics on invalid transitions. However, sched_ext core already implements clearly defined task state transitions. This PR updates scx_lavd so that it uses sched_ext's task state transitions. Note that the commits are structured so that transit_task_stat() is verified to always concur with sched_ext state transitions before the custom mechanism is removed.

While at it, this PR also removes the unnecessary extern crate declarations.

scx_lavd tracks task state transitions and updates statistics on each valid
transition. However, there's an asymmetry between the runnable/running and
stopping/quiescent transitions. In the former, the runnable and running
transitions are accounted separately in update_stat_for_enq() and
update_stat_for_run(), respectively. However, in the latter, the two
transitions are combined together in update_stat_for_stop().

This asymmetry leads to incorrect accounting. For example, a task's load
should be added to the cpu's load sum when the task gets enqueued and
subtracted when the task is no longer runnable (quiescent). The former is
accounted correctly from update_stat_for_enq() but the latter is done
whenever the task stops. A task can transit between running and stopping
multiple times before becoming quiescent, so the asymmetry can end up
subtracting the load of a task which is still running from the cpu's load
sum.

This patch:

- introduces LAVD_TASK_STAT_QUIESCENT and updates transit_task_stat() so
  that it can handle all valid state transitions including the multiple back
  and forth transitions between two pairs - QUIESCENT <-> ENQ and RUNNING
  <-> STOPPING.

- restores the symmetry by moving load adjustments part from
  update_stat_for_stop() to new update_stat_for_quiescent().

This removes a good chunk of ignored transitions. The next patch will take
care of the rest.
LAVD_TASK_STAT_ENQ is tracking a subset of runnable task state transitions -
the ones which end up calling ops.enqueue(). However, what it is trying to
track is a task becoming runnable so that its load can be added to the cpu's
load sum.

Move the LAVD_TASK_STAT_ENQ state transition and update_stat_for_enq()
invocation to ops.runnable() which is called for all runnable transitions.

Note that when all the methods are invoked, the invocation order would be
ops.select_cpu(), runnable() and then enqueue(). So, this change moves
update_stat_for_enq() invocation before calc_when_to_run() for
put_global_rq(). update_stat_for_enq() updates taskc->load_actual which is
consumed by calc_greedy_ratio() and thus affects calc_when_to_run().

Before this patch, calc_greedy_ratio() would use load_actual which doesn't
reflect the last running period. After this patch, the latest running period
will be reflected when the task gets queued to the global queue.

The difference is unlikely to matter but it'd probably make sense to make it
more consistent (e.g. do it at the end of quiescent transition).

After this change, transit_task_stat() doesn't detect any invalid
transitions.
transit_task_stat() is now tracking the same runnable, running, stopping,
quiescent transitions that sched_ext core already tracks and always returns
%true. Let's remove it.
@htejun htejun requested a review from multics69 March 26, 2024 22:31
@multics69 multics69 merged commit 360d4ec into perf-vdeadline01 Mar 28, 2024
1 check passed
@multics69 multics69 deleted the lavd-task-states branch March 28, 2024 04:43
Copy link
Contributor

@multics69 multics69 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes are beautiful and work well on my side.

@htejun htejun restored the lavd-task-states branch March 29, 2024 22:16
@htejun htejun deleted the lavd-task-states branch March 29, 2024 22:34
@htejun htejun restored the lavd-task-states branch May 17, 2024 10:20
@htejun htejun deleted the lavd-task-states branch May 17, 2024 10:24
@htejun htejun restored the lavd-task-states branch June 16, 2024 06:25
@htejun htejun deleted the lavd-task-states branch June 16, 2024 15:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants