Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support prioritized protocol generation #843

Closed
lucix-aws opened this issue Apr 25, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1103
Closed

Support prioritized protocol generation #843

lucix-aws opened this issue Apr 25, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1103
Labels
enhancement New feature or request no-auto-closure We do not want this issue to be automatically closed.

Comments

@lucix-aws
Copy link
Contributor

It's technically possible for a model/service to support multiple protocols.

To that effect, we should define a way to prioritize specific protocol generators when selecting one for codegen.

@lucix-aws lucix-aws added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 25, 2023
Copy link

This is a very old issue that is probably not getting as much attention as it deserves. We encourage you to check if this is still an issue in the latest release and if you find that this is still a problem, please feel free to provide a comment or open a new issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 2 days unless further comments are made. label May 31, 2024
@lauzadis lauzadis added no-auto-closure We do not want this issue to be automatically closed. and removed closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 2 days unless further comments are made. labels May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request no-auto-closure We do not want this issue to be automatically closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants