-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make more use of md5sums #239
Comments
in particular, this should be included in all search-style output. |
This was referenced May 18, 2017
This was referenced May 20, 2017
md5 hashes included in CSV output in #240. |
maybe we want a command like |
This was referenced Dec 30, 2018
Closing in favor of #599. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
md5sum hashes of signatures may be a good way to refer unambiguously to signatures when reporting them, extracting them, etc. we can do a git-like thing of refering to them by prefixes, too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: