Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should xarray:storage_options be split to a separate extension? #1

Open
TomAugspurger opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Collaborator

One of the fields currently in this extension is xarray:storage_options. This describes additional options necessary to open an fsspec URI.

Should that go in its own repository / stac extension? fsspec-style URLs are usable by libraries other than xarray. For example, pandas uses it on its non-HTTPs backend, Zarr can use it independently of xarray.

I really only stuffed it here because creating two repositories with one field each sounded like an unnecessary amount of overhead. But I can split things if we think it would be useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant