Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mcmc_pairs() works differently on an HPC cluster? #298

Open
JasonPekos opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

mcmc_pairs() works differently on an HPC cluster? #298

JasonPekos opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@JasonPekos
Copy link

I can create pairs plots fine on my laptop.

mcmc_pairs(mcmc_out$draws(), np = nuts_params(mcmc_out))

When I run the identical code on the Sharcnet HPC system, if I include np = nuts_params(mcmc_out), the code will fail with the error:

Error in `geom_point()`:
! Problem while computing aesthetics.
ℹ Error occurred in the 2nd layer.
Caused by error in `check_aesthetics()`:
! Aesthetics must be either length 1 or the same as the data (15000)
✖ Fix the following mappings: `colour` and `size`
Run `rlang::last_error()` to see where the error occurred.
@ASKurz
Copy link

ASKurz commented Jan 15, 2023

I'm running into this problem with brm() models (brms 2.18.0; bayesplot 1.10.0).

ASKurz added a commit to ASKurz/Statistical_Rethinking_with_brms_ggplot2_and_the_tidyverse_2_ed that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2023
@rewberl
Copy link

rewberl commented Sep 20, 2024

Also experiencing this issue with a model fit using cmdstanr (2.35.0)

@jgabry
Copy link
Member

jgabry commented Sep 26, 2024

Thanks for bringing this up again. Sorry it's still an issue. Unfortunately I was never able to reproduce this on the cluster I had access to, which made it quite difficult to debug. If anyone has any ideas what might be causing this I'd love to know so we can fix it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants